<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
				<title>Comments on: MySQL: Pagination - SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS vs COUNT()-Query</title>
		<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html</link>
		<description>MySQL: Pagination - SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS vs COUNT()-Query Comment Feed</description>
				<language>de</language>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>mcw[blog] 'Ruby' Alpha 3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1 by: Srini</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment2271</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment2271</guid>
			<author>Srini</author>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Cool! Its 100% True! ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #2 by: Ronald H.</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment2304</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment2304</guid>
			<author>Ronald H.</author>			
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Thanks buddy. I'll be using this code in the future. I also thought you'd like to know there is a great domain name at Godaddy.com that you may be interested in. It's call PHPDEVELOPING.COM and I think its a good fit for you because your a great PHP programmer. You can contact me at my email address and I'll help you get to it if you want. Again, just thought you'd like to know. ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #3 by: Dominik Jungowski</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment2316</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment2316</guid>
			<author>Dominik Jungowski</author>			
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Just keep in mind that it's not always THE solution. When reading from a table that is very frequently updated (more than once a minute), you won't get too much speed benefits, as with each table update the cache query for the respective table runs out.<br />
<br />
Thanks for the address tip, I'll think about it ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #4 by: wasimasif</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment2832</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment2832</guid>
			<author>wasimasif</author>			
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ In my experience sometimes its good to use SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS instead of running separate queries for count. <br />
<br />
If you are running full-text query on table with 2M+ rows then its good idea to use it. When we tried the query with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS, performed better than two separate queries.<br />
<br />
I also agree to prefer SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS on frequently updated table. ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #5 by: php</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment3060</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment3060</guid>
			<author>php</author>			
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ thanks for great post ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #6 by: pe3sos</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment5625</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment5625</guid>
			<author>pe3sos</author>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Cool very beatiful, thanks a lot!!!!  ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #7 by: shanmuganathan</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment24006</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment24006</guid>
			<author>shanmuganathan</author>			
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ We are one of the Leading Web Design Company in chennai,our services are web design,web hosting,seo chennai,email marketing,business blogging,mobile application developing ,brochures designers,logo designers ,graphic designers,flash designers in chennai and san diego.please add my website to your blogger.it is very useful for us. ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #8 by: Hot Water Systems</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment32478</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment32478</guid>
			<author>Hot Water Systems</author>			
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 06:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Thank you, this site has given us an useful information<br />
 ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #9 by: Siegfried</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment33784</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment33784</guid>
			<author>Siegfried</author>			
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 01:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS is slower when the field for its arguments are using index. I that true? ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #10 by: Dominik Jungowski</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment33929</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment33929</guid>
			<author>Dominik Jungowski</author>			
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 15:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ I don't know, but this statement seems to be a bit odd to me. A benchmark would be helpful for that. Where do you have it from? ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #11 by: grid inverters</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment34075</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment34075</guid>
			<author>grid inverters</author>			
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 05:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Cool very beatiful, thanks a lot!!!!  ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #12 by: Siegfried</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment34175</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment34175</guid>
			<author>Siegfried</author>			
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 23:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Yes it's true dominic. I had a test. SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS is faster without index. If you have indexed field, better adding IGNORE INDEX.<br />
<br />
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS * FROM table IGNORE INDEX(id) WHERE id = 1 LIMIT n<br />
<br />
CMIIW ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #13 by: Dominik Jungowski</title>
			<link>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment34402</link>
			<guid>http://www.phpdevblog.net/2009/06/mysql-pagination-sql-calc-found-rows-vs-count-query.html#comment34402</guid>
			<author>Dominik Jungowski</author>			
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Interesting, I have to try that one out. Hope I will think about it tomorrow ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
